Tags
adventure, Ancestry.com, draft, findagrave.com, genealogy, information, journey, Lawson, path, road, shoebox, Whittaker
I was fortunate to know most of my grandparents. On my father’s side, I did not get to know his mother; she died when I was just a baby. His father remarried, and it was his second wife that I knew as my Grandma. Once he died though, she moved away to be closer to her children from a previous marriage, and our family didn’t keep in touch with them. On my mother’s side, I was very fortunate to have both grandparents alive to see many milestones in my life. They were able to see me graduate from high school and later from college. While they didn’t get to see me marry the first time (since I eloped), they did get to be there to see me get married to my present husband. My grandfather died later that year. My grandmother, now in her 90’s, is still with us.
I only ever met one of my great-grandparents. My grandmother’s mother, Thenie F. Whittaker Lawson, had come to Michigan to stay with the family for a time. I was about eight or nine, and somehow, she intimidated, even scared me a little! She seemed much sterner than the smiling image of her daughter above, and I don’t remember her talking much. When she did talk, I don’t remember understanding her much. She mumbled and muttered much of the time. She was in her 80’s at the time, and was probably the oldest person I had ever seen at that time.
I remember the day that she died. My Mom and Grandma had gone with her to the store (Yankees, I believe, but it might have been about the time they were taken over by Zodys). I didn’t go into the store with them; I stayed out in the car (that was back in the days when people left their kids out in the car without fear of them being abducted or overheating). What I remembered was the ambulance coming, sirens going off and lights flashing. I don’t remember much after that other than going home. I didn’t know what had happened to my great-grandmother until later. She had a heart attack while in the store.
In trying to go back into Thenie’s history, I thought it would be easy. After all, Thenie is a rather unusual name. However, I didn’t realize how many twists and turns I would take with the name Whittaker! It didn’t take me long to realize that this again, might be a journey that would not be the straightforward path I had thought it to be.
For example, here are some of the variations of Whittaker that I found on my initial searches:
- Whittaker
- Whitaker
- Whiteaker
- Whitacre
And, as to Thenie being helpful because of it being unusual? I failed to take into account how census takers can mangle a name. And, in this case, I feel they did more than just that.
I had to make some educated guesses with these records, and I believe they all are showing the same family group. However, there is still a possibility that I could be wrong. Judge for yourself.

This is the one census that I know is correct for my family. Notice though that my great-grandmother is listed as Thenia instead of Thenie.
If you think that’s bad, let’s go back to 1910.
Now, here’s also where family lore and census data start to butt heads. My great-grandmother did have a twin whose name was Mary. However, family lore stated she died as an infant. Yet, here she is, almost an adult! The lone son listed here is named Vetery. My great-grandmother had a brother named Vetter.
When I saw my great-grandmother listed here as Othena, somewhere in the back of my mind I could hear someone, in a voice very much like my grandmother’s saying to the census taker, “Now let’s see, we have a Sarah, a Mary, and a Thenie….”
When you get to 1900 though, things really start to get wonky:
OK, now the family has their last name listed as Whitacre. Thenie has now changed into Venie. The twin Mary is still there, and the birthdate is shown as May 1891 (which is the month and year of my great-grandmother’s birth). However, there is a big difference in ages between the Rebecah here and the Rebecca of 10 years later. I do notice though that the 1900’s Rebecah has 9 children of which 5 are living. The 1910 Rebecca has 10 children of which 5 still live.
The big problem I had here was the mystery of the youngest child. ‘Vetery’ who was listed as being about four years younger than the twins (and was listed as a son), had disappeared! In his place was a daughter named “Legie”, born in June of 1896 (which is, coincidentally, when my relative Vetter was born).
Talk about a roller coaster ride! I felt like I was zigging and zagging all over the place with these records. Just when I thought I would find something that would tie everything up neatly, a wild curve sent me whirling into a spin!
Ancestry.com has the option of saving items you aren’t sure tie into your family tree to a ‘Shoebox’ so that you can review them at a later time. I thought for sure that the 1900 and 1910 US Census records I had found would be in my Shoebox for a long time. Then, one day, I decided to do a search on Vetter Whittaker trying to see if I could find out more about him, and I stumbled across this record that I think ties it all together:
So, Vetter’s first name was Leige. To me, this tied Vetter into the Legie that was listed in 1900. Their birth dates were the same month and year. They had somehow entered the gender wrong! Could it have been that the census taker wasn’t paying attention and copied information from the previous line. Had he made an assumption, thinking that Legie sounded like a girl’s name? I know that I’ve seen pictures of very young children, both boys and girls being dressed very much alike. If this boy got any hand-me-downs, they likely came from his sisters. Could the census taker have put down ‘daughter’ without asking anyone what the gender of the child actually was?
It was about this same time that in my journeys out in cyberspace that I came across the website www.findagrave.com. Find A Grave has contributors around the world that update, maintain, and add to the list of over 75 million grave sites. Searching the records is very easy, and you can sometimes find a great deal of information. Vetter was one of the first people who I searched for. Not only did I find him listed, but someone had actually taken pictures of his grave marker! Even more exciting was the fact that a piece on the head stone contained a picture of Vetter and his wife!
Eventually, I ran out of steam on this line as well, and so, I turned away from looking into my side of the family tree entirely and began to journey into my husband’s ancestral past.
Enjoyed your post and applaud you for staying the course in researching census records. It’s helpful to keep an open mind on spellings of names and genders listed for people. I’ve also had family surnames misspelled, children not listed even though they were alive (my grandfather) and a boy listed as my great-grandmother’s brother in one census and he never appeared again, even though he was old enough to have been in the previous census. No one knows anything about him! You may have heard this before, but if families weren’t home when the census taker came by, they would often ask neighbors for the family’s information. Neighbors sometimes gave incorrect details and this contributed to mistakes in census records as well.
Best of luck with your research and your new blog.
P.S. Isn’t the Shoebox option at Ancestry great? I’ve used it and referred back to records at a later date.
Thanks for your visit, Queen Bee! With a lot of my family, I see middle names used on one census, and first names on another. This is the first time though I had seen a change in gender!
I had not heard of the census takers asking the neighbors before. Good to know! I had heard that they would ask the oldest available person in the house when they came to call, and if parents were gone, that could mean a child was giving answers about birth years and so many other things.
I do like the Shoebox as well. I’ve added bits and pieces from time to time. A few have made their way into my official records, and some have been sent back into Cyberspace for their true relatives to discover.
Thank you very much for your comments! I hope to stop by and see what you’re writing about soon!
Stopping by from Geneabloggers! Welcome to what is an addictive and friendly world. I look forward to catching up on your recent posts and to following new ones!
Julie,
Thanks for stopping! I’ve recently discovered Geneabloggers and found it to be a wonderful resource to find genealogy blogs that interest me. I look forward to visiting your site soon!
Welcome to the GeneaBloggers family. Hope you find the association fruitful; I sure do. I have found it most stimulating, especially some of the Daily Themes.
May you keep sharing your ancestor stories!
Dr. Bill 😉
http://drbilltellsancestorstories.blogspot.com/
Author of “13 Ways to Tell Your Ancestor Stories” and family saga novels:
“Back to the Homeplace” and “The Homeplace Revisited”
http://thehomeplaceseries.blogspot.com/
http://www.examiner.com/x-53135-Springfield-Genealogy-Examiner
http://www.examiner.com/x-58285-Ozarks-Cultural-Heritage-Examiner
Thanks, Dr. Bill! GeneaBloggers has already connected me with several people whose family stories get me excited about finding more out about my own family, so I can share with them as well. 🙂
Welcome to GeneaBloggers! I enjoyed this post and the 1900 census record reminds me of finding my seven-year-old father-in-law in the 1930 census as a female. See http://frommainetokentucky.blogspot.com/2011/05/tuesdays-tip-errors-in-census-records.html for that story.
Elizabeth,
That was a great post! I’m looking forward to reading more of your blog in the days ahead.
Welcome to GeneaBloggers.
Thank you!